She is NOT for the Streets

Women Must Not be Patrol Officers

If you want to see me devolve into a hysterical, screaming weirdo, all you have to do is ask me about opposite-sex prison guards.

The thought of male corrections officers (or admin staff) in women’s prisons— or female guards in men’s prisons—is so enraging, so outrageous, that I start making insane character assumptions about people who shrug at the concept.

“If a woman can pass the fitness test, the male prison should hire her as a guard,” they say.

To which I must refrain from asking, “Why do you hate women and want them dead?”

I don’t even think male janitors should be allowed in a woman’s prison. Nor female secretaries in men’s prisons. Ever.

Like I said, it’s not exactly a balanced position.

My views on the police force are similarly restrictive, but without the histrionics. It’s mere practicality.

Women are physically inferior to men. And even boys. We cannot beat men in a foot race. We cannot safely disarm a man with a knife.

We cannot do much of anything against an aggressive man, save shooting him to death.

So why are women being put out on patrol, when de-escalation and non-lethal restraint is the name of the game?

Because TV told us we could do it and our feminist forebears demanded it.

Back to the Kitchen?

Before you start furiously typing a screed that includes accusations of “trad” and “pick-me,” allow me to specify that women should not be barred from police service entirely. Nor from employment, in general.

Your favorite trad-con influencer thinks women ought not be police at all. They should not be in the military in any capacity. Should not work at all, really. They should be mothers. Barring that, they should be nuns or home-bound service-oriented aunties who teach school and contribute to charity.

As a woman myself, and a military veteran to boot, I disagree with that stance.

What I DO agree with is that no woman should be on patrol. No woman should be a police captain or lieutenant.

Matt Walsh is one of those conservatives that women often point to as the kind of voice that turns them off from right-wing politics and culture. Fair enough. He tends toward a scolding tone and a one-size-fits-all advice model. In this particular instance, I share his opinion. Many men (and women) applauded this take right along with me.

But another one of my favorite follows, a police officer himself, didn’t take kindly to it:

My concerns over woman patrol officers don’t stem from them being “bad cops.” In a viral video by YouTuber Think Before You Sleep, he detailed many of the concerns about the presence of female officers on patrol. He spoke about the perceptions of women cops getting a thrill from being in charge and escalating situations when they should be calming things down.

It’s a common stereotype—the nagging bitch drunk on power. But is that a female trait, or a trait of people who seek out positions of authority because they’re already insecure bullies? I don’t have the stats on that, honestly. But I’m not sure it’s a gendered phenomenon.

TBYS also mentioned the problems that I AM concerned about. He showed an instance of a male bystander having to help subdue a violent felon because the female officer conducting the traffic stop wasn’t strong enough to do so.

Women have to pull their taser or their firearm to subdue a man, whereas another man can just choke the fucker until he behaves.

This is why you rarely see two female patrol officers partnered. Because even two women against one man is no guarantee of a non-lethal outcome.

That being said, I would rail against anyone who said there should be no women on the police force. Not because I want to be a cop, but because I have been the victim of crime in the past and God forbid, I may be again in the future.

Love you fellas, but sometimes I don’t want you around, if you please.

So in my fantasy land where I’m in charge of the country (or even just Kansas City), what would I do with the police force?

I want a segregated, dedicated woman’s police force. We had one once and I think we were all better for it.

Bring Back Woman Police Constables

Last month I was honored to be a guest on a podcast with E.H. Drake talking about Charlie’s Angels and its distinctively 1970s brand of feminism. One of the ladies on the panel pointed out that the angels were given “menial tasks” as police officers and had to go freelance to do something “meaningful.”

Author Christine Husom described the show as a diversion, giving hope and joy to women who wanted to serve their communities and make their loved ones proud. However, she said the abilities and circumstances of the angels were not at all reflective of her own experience as a woman deputy in the 1980s. It was a nice escape to watch pretty girls being competent and confident, but the show had nothing to do with the reality of women going up against street thugs.

Cheryl Ladd, Angel

People underestimate how much a show like that CAN normalize things and change their opinion of it. Media can be destiny. And women fighting crime on TV has put it into the popular zeitgeist that women CAN do anything a man can do. That their outstanding character and sense of justice is sufficient.

It isn’t.

Just as it was in 20th-century England, women police constables (WPCs) should take the lead on cases involving women and children (domestic abuse, child abuse and neglect, sex assaults). Hell, put the WPCs in charge of internet sex predation. Lord knows our natural “Karen” instinct would put the pervs on notice.

They should also be in charge of processing and supervising female offenders, including hookers. This protects the WPCs and female offenders.

In my humble opinion, this force should also have a distinct uniform from the male patrolmen, one less tactically focused. The WPC will not be deployed for a foot chase or called upon to grapple with disgusting fentanyl addicts.

She should be respectable looking. More importantly, she should be identifiable from a distance, her silhouette declaring “safe person” to any lost child or person in distress.

A modest suggestion

But she must also be armed. I don’t abide the foolish notion of “just send social workers” to domestic calls. This is the fantasy of rich white liberals who live in gated communities.

Even taking women off of patrol doesn’t ensure their safety. That’s not the world we live in.

Recall, if you will, the pilot episode of CSI: Crime Scene Investigation which shocked its audience with the ending.

We were introduced to bright-eyed young CSI Holly Gribbs (played by Chandra West) who seemed to be our main character. She would be the audience avatar that we would relate to as she navigated this strange world of processing crime scenes.

But that’s not what happened. At the end of the first episode, Holly went to a crime scene. One that wasn’t secured by officers properly. Warren, her male colleague, fucked off and left her alone at the scene. And the killer came back, found her there processing the scene, and shot her to death. She wasn’t armed. She wasn’t even a cop. She had no power to arrest him. He killed her anyway.

And that was the story of Holly.

That’s the job. And putting females in more appropriate police roles for their abilities doesn’t remove them from danger. So yes, WPCs will wear a gun. And know how to use it effectively.

The face you make when you know you’re about to die

The thing about women being excluded from jobs, no matter how unsuited they are for it, comes down to ego. Dangerous jobs are more respected. They pay better too. Often they offer quicker or better opportunities for advancement. BECAUSE they are hard. Because they’re dangerous. And the men who perform these jobs risk their lives, their mobility, their limbs, and often lose their marriage, their health, and sometimes their mind, in the performance of these jobs.

The women and male feminists screaming for complete equality in front-line, high-hazard jobs focus on the material gain, ignoring the harm these jobs result in. Often these activists aren’t even in law enforcement or the military. They’re liberal arts majors with desk jobs demanding equality of outcome for their own self-aggrandizement, stepping over the bodies of the women they get killed, raped, or maimed in the process.

Unfortunately, I’m not in charge of society. Truth be told, my dictatorship probably wouldn’t be popular if I were to be placed in charge.

All I can say about women police is that they don’t belong on patrol. Not because they lack honor or fortitude or a selfless desire for safety and justice. But because their presence in ill-fitting roles makes everyone less safe. The woman officers, the petty shit-head perps who need a night in jail, and the public at large.

Patrol officer is a job for men.

That’s it. That’s all.

Instead of ignoring that, let’s have women serve in a way that benefits us all.

---

Buy Pop Culture Heretic: Morality Through a Screen—the definitive case for how movies and other fiction (not your parents or priest) formed your morality and culture.